Comparative Analysis of the Social Life of Citizens and Political Interpretation Dublin, Chicago and Moscow

Research Paper (undergraduate) from the year 2017 in the subject American Studies - Comparative Literature, grade: 25, South Asian University (Department of International Relations), course: Masters of International Relations, language: English, abstract: This paper discusses the political and social life of the citizens of Dublin, Chicago and Moscow based on three exceptional classics which were written by three phenomenon authors in the world literature. The selected context describes the society in early World War period and how these respective cities changed due to external factors and variety of social forms. The changes which took place in respective cities directly influenced by the life and political behavior of the people. Thus, the researcher analyzes the political and economic behavior of the cities based on the concepts of 'Voice, Loyalty and Exit.' The author describes the social context based on International Relations, the Hobbesian nature of the humans and illustrated the respective society. The entire paper is based on the original classics which were written by the respective authors and through that, the researcher attempted to provide a social review based on direct dimension. The research conducted to identify major social transformations and external, internal motives behind the social transformation. The role of the capital and the social classification identified as the major influence on the social reformation and the researcher exercised comparative analytical tools to draw a line among these three cities and common social behaviors of respective cities. The role of religious institutions was a major social factor which influenced to the social life in these three different cities. Mainly the early war period made a dramatic changed of the capital and financial waves of the society and this dynamic role of the finance provided a background to the change of the social life. These two major reasons and five additional reasons bring to the conclusion by the author.